Connect with us

Science

New Research Traces Origin of Moon’s Precursor Planet Theia

Editorial

Published

on

A recent study has revealed new insights into the origins of Theia, the long-lost planet believed to have played a crucial role in the formation of the Moon. This research suggests that Theia likely formed much closer to the Sun than previously thought, challenging long-held assumptions about the early Solar System.

According to a research team from France, Germany, and the United States, Theia is believed to have originated from the inner Solar System. For decades, the prevailing theory has been that Theia collided with the early Earth approximately 4.5 billion years ago, resulting in debris that ultimately formed the Moon. This hypothesis, known as the giant impact theory, has been a topic of discussion since the analysis of the first Apollo samples more than 50 years ago.

The disappearance of Theia billions of years ago has left scientists without direct chemical evidence to support the theory. As a result, pinpointing its exact origin and composition has remained a significant challenge for researchers. To address this, the team analyzed ancient lunar and terrestrial rocks to trace Theia’s origins.

Jake Foster, an astronomer at the Royal Observatory Greenwich in the UK, who was not involved in the study, commented on the significance of the research: “One of the things about this research that does make it so exciting is not only is it helping to paint a picture of what happened to the Earth four and a half billion years ago, but also it’s able to almost exactly pinpoint where this object came from.”

The research team adopted a reverse engineering approach to investigate Theia’s origins. They examined isotopes from rocks collected on Earth and samples returned from the Moon by Apollo astronauts. These isotopes act like chemical fingerprints, providing vital information about the materials involved in the formation of both the Earth and the Moon.

Scientists had previously identified that Earth and Moon rocks share nearly identical metal isotope ratios. This similarity complicated efforts to distinguish between materials from early Earth and those from Theia. The new study tackled this challenge by analyzing isotopes of iron, chromium, zirconium, and molybdenum. The researchers modeled hundreds of potential scenarios for early Earth and Theia, assessing which combinations could produce the observed isotope signatures.

The findings indicate that materials forming closer to the Sun exhibit different temperatures and conditions than those further away. By comparing these isotope patterns, the researchers concluded that Theia likely formed in the inner Solar System, potentially even closer to the Sun than Earth itself. This marks a shift from earlier beliefs that Theia may have originated further out in the Solar System.

The implications of this research extend beyond understanding the Moon’s formation. It offers valuable insights into how planets grow, collide, and evolve during the early stages of a solar system. As scientists continue to explore the mysteries of planetary formation, this analysis may pave the way for further investigations into the dynamics of our cosmic neighborhood.

For those interested in visual content related to this research, a video is available in the media player above.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.