Slovenia Votes Against Assisted Dying Law in Referendum

On March 24, 2024, voters in Slovenia rejected a proposed law permitting assisted dying for terminally ill patients, according to preliminary results from the State Electoral Commission. Approximately 53 percent of voters opposed the legislation, while around 46 percent supported it. This decision suspends the existing law, which had been enacted by Parliament in July 2023 after initial public support in a nonbinding referendum.

The turnout for the referendum was nearly 41 percent, representing over 20 percent of Slovenia’s 1.7 million eligible voters. Activist Ales Primc, who spearheaded the campaign against the law, claimed victory, stating, “Compassion has won.” He argued that Slovenia has rejected a government approach to health and social reforms that he characterized as based on “death by poisoning.”

Opponents of assisted dying, including conservative groups and some medical associations, collected over 40,000 signatures to compel this second vote. They contended that the proposed law contradicted Slovenia’s constitution and insisted that the government should focus on enhancing palliative care instead.

The proposed legislation would have allowed mentally competent individuals facing unbearable pain and no chance of recovery to choose assisted dying. Patients would have needed approval from two doctors and undergone a consultation period before administering lethal medication themselves. Notably, the law did not extend to individuals with mental illnesses.

Despite the setback, advocates for assisted dying expressed disappointment but maintained hope for future legislative efforts. Prime Minister Robert Golob acknowledged the outcome, stating, “While the current bill was rejected, the challenge we are addressing still remains.” He emphasized that the issue transcends political boundaries, framing it as a matter of dignity, human rights, and individual choice.

President Natasa Pirc Musar praised the importance of public participation in the electoral process, urging citizens to voice their opinions on critical issues, not just during parliamentary or presidential elections. “It is right for us as individuals to say what we think about a certain topic,” she remarked.

Slovenia’s decision contrasts with legislative trends in several other European Union countries, including Austria, which have already enacted similar laws. The ongoing debate about assisted dying reflects broader societal attitudes towards end-of-life choices and the role of government in regulating personal health decisions.