Connect with us

Politics

Greece and Germany Plan African Migrant Return Hubs

Editorial

Published

on

Greece and Germany are collaborating to establish facilities in Africa aimed at receiving migrants deported from Europe, announced Greece’s Migration Minister Thanos Plevris on Wednesday. This initiative marks a significant step in addressing illegal migration, as discussions are ongoing with several African nations willing to accept individuals whose return to their home countries is not feasible.

In an interview with Greece’s public broadcaster ERT, Plevris stated, “Discussions are underway with safe African countries that will accept illegal immigrants whom we cannot return to their homelands.” He clarified that these talks are being conducted independently, outside the framework of the European Union, emphasizing that Germany is leading this initiative. Plevris remarked, “Germany has taken a serious initiative and we have officially expressed our interest in participating in it.” He believes that relocating these centers outside Europe could act as a deterrent for potential migrants.

Details of the Initiative

An official from the German interior ministry confirmed to POLITICO that during a meeting on November 4, Plevris and his German counterpart discussed “innovative solutions” to reduce illegal migration. They are currently collaborating on the legal framework necessary for implementing the proposed return hubs.

Last month, Europe’s home affairs ministers convened in Luxembourg to discuss new migration regulations, including the establishment of return hubs for rejected asylum applicants. However, no concrete agreements were reached during these discussions.

Greece has adopted a stringent stance on migration in recent years. The Greek government presented a comprehensive plan to other EU nations last summer, one that aimed to deter migrants effectively. Plevris noted that other countries are also exploring similar strategies. For instance, the Netherlands recently signed an agreement with Uganda to facilitate the return of rejected asylum seekers, although this arrangement is limited to migrants from countries near Uganda.

Comparative Projects and Legal Considerations

Plevris’ proposal bears resemblance to a stalled initiative in Italy, where the government sought to intercept and detain asylum seekers for processing in Albania. This project, promoted by right-wing Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, has received positive feedback from various European leaders, including Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. However, the Italian scheme remains entangled in legal challenges, particularly regarding the compatibility of processing migrants in third countries with EU law.

Plevris expressed confidence that any legal hurdles related to the new hubs could be resolved but raised concerns about the effectiveness of current plans. He argued that while Albania’s approach may not serve as a sufficient deterrent, establishing return hubs outside Europe could present a more compelling solution. “Imagine taking an Egyptian and sending him to Uganda,” he stated, underscoring the potential deterrent effect of such a strategy.

The developments in Greece and Germany reflect a broader trend within Europe regarding migration policies. As nations search for effective methods to manage migrant flows, these discussions represent a significant pivot toward establishing international cooperation beyond the continent itself.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.