Connect with us

Top Stories

Archaeologist Critiques Wexford Council for Demolishing Historic Homes

Editorial

Published

on

Dr. Richard Gem, a former president of the British Archaeological Association, has publicly criticized Wexford County Council for its decision to allow the demolition of historic homes in Wexford town. The council, along with the state planning authority, approved plans for a developer to tear down houses dating back to the mid-1800s in an area known as The Faythe, located near Wexford Harbour.

The Faythe is recognized as a significant part of Wexford’s history, characterized by its narrow streets and rich architectural heritage. Gem expressed his disappointment, stating that it was “some surprise and concern” that this area is not designated as an Architectural Conservation Area (ACA) in Wexford’s County Development Plan. He noted the nearest designated area ends precisely at The Faythe, which could mislead onlookers into believing there is nothing of historical value worth preserving.

Concerns Over Development and Historical Significance

Gem warned that pressures to develop land for housing could jeopardize the historical and archaeological interests of The Faythe. Local residents have also voiced their concerns, citing a planning report that indicated the proposed development would lead to a “crammed” environment. They are advocating for conservation status for the area, highlighting the need for careful consideration amid the ongoing housing crisis.

In 2021, Bawn Developments sought planning permission to demolish three houses to make way for a new block of apartments and additional housing units. Despite receiving over 90 objections, Wexford County Council granted initial approval in late 2023. This decision was later reviewed by An Bord Pleanála, which also raised concerns about the development’s density.

Angela Brereton, an inspector from An Bord Pleanála, described the proposed site as unsuitable, stating it would not enhance the visual quality of the area. Despite her concerns, the planning board voted 2-1 in favor of the development, overruling Brereton’s recommendations.

Community Response and Protests

Local community group Fight 4 The Faythe has emerged in response to the council’s decision, organizing weekly protests against the demolition. Sue Rea, the group’s founder, emphasized the importance of balancing housing needs with the preservation of existing communities and amenities. “We are in a housing crisis, but town planners should be considerate of existing residents,” Rea commented.

The homes slated for demolition include a building that was previously a thatched cottage, dating back to the early 1700s. Residents have expressed sadness over the removal of a mural honoring George Ross, a local accordion player, which had decorated the corner of the street for several years.

Wexford County Council defended its decision, stating that the homes are not designated as Protected Structures and asserting that the mural’s contribution to the streetscape is subjective. Both the council and Bawn Developments were contacted for further comments but did not respond.

As the situation unfolds, the community continues to rally for the preservation of The Faythe, reflecting a broader conversation about the intersection of development and heritage in Ireland.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.