UPDATE: A Rathgar car dealer has urgently revamped its plans to transform the former showroom site into a housing development. The new application, submitted for the Murphy&Gunn dealership located at Kenilworth Square South, proposes 19 residential homes, marking a significant shift in the development strategy.

The latest proposal features three blocks of housing, which includes seven two-bedroom, eight three-bedroom, and four four-bedroom units. This revision adds an extra housing unit compared to earlier plans, indicating a response to community needs and feedback. However, it dramatically alters the previous layout, which sought five blocks consisting of 18 housing units and was rejected due to concerns regarding local impact.

Dublin City Council previously denied the initial application citing issues that would adversely affect the area and its residents. The council’s planning report emphasized that the proposed development would disrupt an established building line on Kenilworth Square South, leading to poor design responses on Rathgar Avenue. The report stated, “The proposed development would seriously injure the amenities and depreciate the value of property in the vicinity.”

Residents expressed worries about the potential overshadowing and diminished living standards for future occupants, leading to the refusal of the first application. As the new proposal is now under consideration, Dublin City Council has opened a window for public observations until August 20, 2023.

The community is urged to voice their opinions on the revised plans, as a decision from Dublin City Council planners will follow shortly after this deadline. The outcome could significantly influence local housing dynamics and property values in the area.

This housing development proposal highlights the ongoing challenges in meeting Dublin’s housing demands while balancing community concerns. Residents are closely monitoring these developments, as the implications extend beyond mere architecture to the overall quality of life in Rathgar.

Stay tuned for further updates as this story develops, and join our community to receive the latest news directly. Click here to participate in our breaking news service!

UPDATE: A Rathgar car dealer has just announced a significant revamp of its controversial housing development plans, aiming to transform its former showroom site into a residential complex. The new proposal for the Murphy & Gunn dealership on Kenilworth Square South seeks to build 19 residential homes, an increase from a previous application that was denied.

The revised application includes three blocks of housing, featuring seven two-bedroom, eight three-bedroom, and four four-bedroom units. This latest proposal, submitted to Dublin City Council, modifies the original layout significantly and adds an additional housing unit—a crucial development as the city faces a housing crisis.

The prior application for 18 housing units was rejected primarily due to concerns over its impact on local residents and the surrounding area. Officials highlighted that the original plans would disrupt the established building line along Kenilworth Square South and create overshadowing issues for nearby properties. According to the council’s planning report, “the proposed development would seriously injure the amenities and depreciate the value of property in the vicinity.”

As Dublin grapples with ongoing housing shortages, this proposal is expected to evoke strong reactions from the community. Local residents expressed concerns about potential overdevelopment and its implications on neighborhood standards. Observations on the new application can be submitted until August 20, with a decision from planners anticipated shortly thereafter.

The urgency of this development is evident, as community members are eager to voice their opinions. Will the new design meet the expectations of both the developers and local residents? The implications of this decision could set a precedent for future housing projects in the area.

Stay updated on the latest developments as this story unfolds. Join our community for breaking news directly from Dublin and surrounding areas, and participate in shaping the future of Rathgar’s housing landscape.

UPDATE: New documents reveal that Michael McDowell, as Ireland’s attorney general in 2000, urged the British government to grant amnesty to “on-the-run” IRA members without the need for parliamentary approval. This revelation, emerging from recently released UK files, has sparked renewed discussions about the controversial treatment of IRA members.

McDowell’s proposal suggested that instead of struggling to pass legislation through Westminster, the British could utilize an ancient legal provision to issue pardons without trials. British officials reportedly reacted with astonishment to this recommendation, highlighting the contentious nature of the issue surrounding IRA members sought for serious offenses, including murder.

The controversy surrounding the IRA “on-the-runs” (OTRs) escalated significantly in 2014, when it was disclosed that nearly 300 IRA members had received “comfort letters,” assuring them they were not wanted by British authorities. This matter came to the forefront during the trial of John Downey, an alleged IRA member accused of the 1982 Hyde Park bombing that resulted in the deaths of four British soldiers and seven horses. Downey’s trial collapsed when it surfaced that he had received a comfort letter in 2007, despite an active arrest warrant.

Details from the newly released documents indicate that McDowell’s amnesty idea was first discussed in a meeting between Irish and British officials in November 2000. He argued that London could grant “pardons before convictions” without needing to introduce new laws. This assertion was met with skepticism from British officials, who maintained that a royal pardon could only be applied post-conviction.

Following this initial proposal, McDowell reiterated his stance during a subsequent meeting in Zagreb, Croatia, with then-Irish Taoiseach Bertie Ahern and UK Prime Minister Tony Blair. He cited the British government’s historical decision not to prosecute Soviet spy Anthony Blunt as a precedent for granting immunity without full legislative backing.

Despite McDowell’s insistence on the legal flexibility of the British system, officials from the Northern Ireland Office expressed doubt, indicating that such a broad approach to immunity would be unprecedented and difficult to justify. Bill Jeffreys, political director at the Northern Ireland Office, noted that McDowell’s suggestion diverged from the established legal framework and would likely face significant opposition from the British attorney general.

In a separate but related matter, the files also shed light on Sinn Féin’s efforts to protect prominent IRA figures in the United States from deportation during the late 1990s, particularly under President Bill Clinton’s administration. The urgency of these negotiations was underscored by concerns that the incoming George W. Bush presidency might take a tougher stance.

Gerry Kelly, a Sinn Féin representative, voiced frustrations about the lack of progress, stating that delays were hampering the party’s objectives. The revelation of McDowell’s push for an IRA amnesty adds a crucial chapter to the ongoing debate about the legacy of the Troubles and the political maneuvering that shaped peace negotiations.

As the discussion unfolds, it raises critical questions about the balance between justice and reconciliation in post-conflict societies. The implications of these revelations will likely resonate throughout the political landscape as stakeholders assess their historical and legal significance.

Stay tuned for further updates as this story develops and as officials respond to these newly uncovered insights.

UPDATE: A new report from the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) reveals that residents of disadvantaged communities in Ireland hold increasingly negative attitudes towards immigration. This finding, based on a 2023 Department of Equality survey, highlights a growing concern that is shaping social dynamics across the nation.

The study indicates that people living in economically strained areas—defined by higher rates of lone-parent households, unemployment, and low education levels—are particularly wary of immigration. Researchers noted that these communities perceive an increased “resource threat” with rising migrant populations, as they fear competition over limited resources.

The report shows a direct correlation between the influx of migrants and the intensification of negative sentiments, particularly in regions experiencing significant demographic changes. Strikingly, while negative attitudes have surged in areas with more migrants, the most substantial growth in migrant populations between 2011 and 2022 occurred in the least disadvantaged areas of Ireland.

Furthermore, the research highlights a geographic divide: rural residents exhibit more negativity towards immigration than their urban counterparts. However, in rural regions where migrants cluster, attitudes align more closely with urban sentiments, suggesting that social interaction plays a crucial role in shaping opinions.

The implications of these findings are substantial. The report emphasizes that fostering positive social contact between migrants and non-migrants is vital for improving community cohesion. According to report author Fran McGinnity, “Communities are spaces where migrants and non-migrants not only encounter each other but can also form lasting social ties.” She further asserts that such interactions can lead to stronger, more cohesive communities over time.

Co-author Keire Murphy added that the research sheds light on the factors driving anti-immigrant sentiment. “Socioeconomic factors like community-level disadvantage seem to matter, implying that the broader social and economic context is important for attitudes towards immigration,” she stated.

Interestingly, the study found no direct link between negative attitudes and local pressures on services such as healthcare, housing, and education. Instead, it suggests a more generalized concern regarding service pressures across Ireland as a whole, indicating that perceptions may be shaped more by national narratives than by local realities.

As these findings gain traction, they underline an urgent need for policies that promote integration and address the root causes of negative sentiment. With immigration continuing to be a hot-button issue, understanding the dynamics at play in different communities is crucial for fostering a more inclusive society.

Next Steps: Stakeholders and policymakers are urged to consider these insights as they develop strategies aimed at improving migrant integration and addressing community concerns. The report’s implications for social cohesion are profound, calling for immediate action to bridge divides and promote understanding.

As this story evolves, the focus will remain on the critical intersection of socioeconomic factors and public sentiment towards immigration in Ireland. Stay tuned for further updates.