Connolly Defends Hiring of Former Prisoner Amid Controversy

Independent presidential candidate Catherine Connolly has defended her decision to employ Ursula Ní Shionnain, a member of the political organization Éirígi, who had previously served a prison sentence for possession of arms and ammunition. Connolly made these remarks during an election event in Blackpool, Cork, on Saturday, stating that she consulted with a prison visiting committee before making her hiring decision in 2018.

Connolly emphasized that she took the initiative to investigate Ní Shionnain’s background prior to her employment in Dáil Éireann. She noted that she spoke with committee members who had visited Ní Shionnain while she was incarcerated. Connolly expressed confidence in Ní Shionnain’s rehabilitation, asserting, “This woman came on the highest recommendations,” referencing comments made by Eamon Ó Cuív, who publicly supported Ní Shionnain.

When questioned about the specific checks carried out to determine Ní Shionnain’s suitability, Connolly explained that the vetting process was handled by An Garda Síochána. However, she pointed out that the lengthy nature of this process resulted in Ní Shionnain leaving her position before its completion. “The checks are carried out by An Garda Síochána. I carried out checks by finding out what was the woman’s history in terms of the politicians that knew her and her background,” she stated.

Connolly expressed concern over the public disclosure of Ní Shionnain’s past, questioning the motivations behind it. She stated, “It’s of extreme concern to me that this information has become public, and I think there’s a duty on all of us to ask, ‘How did this information become public, for what purpose?’”

Ní Shionnain, who previously declined to comment when approached by The Irish Times, was still recognized as an Éirígi member at the time of her hiring. Connolly’s remarks have sparked debate among political parties regarding the implications of hiring individuals with criminal backgrounds and the process of vetting candidates for governmental positions.

The controversy surrounding Connolly’s hiring decision highlights ongoing discussions about rehabilitation, privacy, and transparency in politics. As the election approaches, the focus on Connolly’s choices may shape public perception and influence voter sentiment.